Guidelines on Writing Good Reviews

Point 1: At first, be ready to accept the invitation concerning paper reviewing. The first step in case you deal with the journal article review lies in accepting the invitation. When you decide to be engaged in writing good reviews, consider the following points: 1) Do you have enough time to make a review within the stipulated deadline? 2) Does the given article relate to your domain of competence? 3) Can you be completely sure that you finish the review on time? When you have already accepted the invitation, you have to read the given article and start composing a paper.

Point 2: Familiarize yourself with the article. As usual, I try to deal with reading with a pen in hand to allow myself jotting down my ideas within the boundaries of margins. During the process of reading, I highlight parts of the content that appear to be crucial, jot down any questions I possess, and improve any blunders I see. This method can be applied when having a deal with different types of reviews, even when writing film review.

Point 3: Compose a short overview of the article and its ‘donations.’ When I write the rough copy of the review, one of the first things to do is to sum up the article in a couple of sentences. In case I think about the article in a positive manner and consider it to be worth a publication, I very often will compose a longer overview and emphasize the strong points of the article. Do not forget that in case you cannot say you possess some critical point of view, it is still necessary to compose a review paper. Your critique can help persuade the editor of the significance of the article under review. Since you write this overview, consider the suitability associated with article when it comes to publication.

Perhaps, sometimes you will face some difficult moments with all these details to be observed when writing a review. In this case, there is one more way out: go online and find a reliable writing agency. When it is done, try to ask them to provide you with a service review template, which can help you to cope with the assignment.

Point 4: Point out the major criticism of the paper. In case you do a peer review, start with bigger issues and finish with minor ones. There are a few significant criticism areas to take into account:

  • Can you tell that the paper is well-arranged?
  • Are all parts well-elaborated?
  • Does a writer perform a good work when dealing with a synthesis of literary sources?
  • Does a writer answer all questions set earlier?
  • Has all methodology been explained in a clear way?
  • Are all principles related to the information?

You are not sure that you can answer all the above-mentioned questions correctly and appropriately? If yes, perhaps the solution here is custom writings. Review assignments are not as easy as it may seem at the first glance.

Point 5: Jot down any minor criticisms regarding the article.  After you have discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the article, one can say that it is completely acceptable and sometimes even welcomed to highlight that the chart on page 4 is mislabeled, that a writer typed “compliment” instead of “complement” on page 9, or other similar blunders. Improving these minor mistakes can certainly make the paper of a writer much more professional in case it goes out for another peer review, and certainly will need to be improved before becoming adopted for the process of publication.

So, now you can see that the procedure of writing a review is not a piece of cake at all; even case custom reviews may be a bit complicated to deal with.

Fore more information visit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *